Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://10.1.7.192:80/jspui/handle/123456789/11798
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Ritesh-
dc.contributor.authorGoodell, John W.-
dc.contributor.authorOriani, Marco Ercole-
dc.contributor.authorPaltrinieri, Andrea-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-22T10:18:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-22T10:18:54Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.1.7.192:80/jspui/handle/123456789/11798-
dc.descriptionVol.55, 2023en_US
dc.description.abstractRecently among finance academic journals, it has become no longer the case that the highest externally rated journals are necessarily the most cited. Through the lens of a bibliometric case study, we highlight the integral contribution of ABS 2 articles to bibliometric-based conclusions. We demonstrate that selecting ABS2+ versus ABS3+ significantly changes results. Conceptually, we argue that as bibliometric analysis is citation based, a priori cutoffs for article inclusion should also be journal citation based, rather than external journal rankings based. Now that several ABS 2 journals are among the highest cited journals in finance, reconsiderations are needed.en_US
dc.publisherFinance Research Lettersen_US
dc.subjectFaculty Paperen_US
dc.subjectFaculty Paper, Managementen_US
dc.subjectManagement, Faculty Paperen_US
dc.subjectBibliometric methodologyen_US
dc.subjectAcademic Journal Guideen_US
dc.subjectJournal rankingsen_US
dc.titleThe importance of ABS 2 journals in finance scholarship: Evidence from a bibliometric case studyen_US
dc.typeFaculty Papersen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty Papers, IM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.