Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://10.1.7.192:80/jspui/handle/123456789/3194
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnjum, Mahtab-
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Nadeem-
dc.contributor.authorJayaprasad, P.-
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, Ritesh-
dc.contributor.authorPathan, S. K.-
dc.contributor.authorAjai-
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-30T09:33:38Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-30T09:33:38Z-
dc.date.issued2006-09-27-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the ISPRS Commission IV Symposium on Geospatial Database for Sustainable Development, September 27-30, 2006, Goa, Page No. 55-60en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.1.7.181:1900/jspui/123456789/3194-
dc.description.abstractThe Most Traditional Source of Ground Control Point's (GCP)geodetic Coordinates has been the topographic maps. However, with the advent of the global Positioning System (GPS), it has become very easy to establish the GCP's Coordinate in the Field using a geodetic GPS Receiver. This Source of GCP's Give the Coordinates in a Fixed Datum (Say, WGS84) Whereas the Topographic maps in our Country are in different Datum i.e. Modified Everest, Once the Data is Collected Using GPS it has to be Processed with Few Reference Stations (IGS) so as to generate the Final Coordinates. Many Softwares, Both freeware as well as Commercial, are available for its processing, but the problem of phase ambiguity resolution over large baselines and the Various ionospheric and tropospheric Correction modules becomes deciding when one wants to choose among them. In this Study we have tried to compare the result of two Campaigns Processed Using Two Different GPS Post Processing Softwares, Carried Out in a Hiily and another over a plain terrain. It has been observed that in the positional coordinate the deviations are not much but in the height the difference found was as high as 4-5m. The difference is attributed to the detailed ionospheric and tropospheric corrections as well as the use of various earth rotation parameters taken in the standard software as compared to the freeware. Also the difference of datum and use of various tectonic plates for the computation of station velocities as Considered in the Standard packages has contributed to this difference.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNUSAD008-5en_US
dc.subjectGround Control Pointen_US
dc.subjectGPS Data Processingen_US
dc.subjectIGSen_US
dc.subjectPrecise Orbitsen_US
dc.subjectAccuracy Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectMathematics and Humanities Faculty Paperen_US
dc.subjectFaculty Paperen_US
dc.subjectNUSAD008en_US
dc.titleEstablishing Precise Ground Control Points Using DGPS Measurements and Different Processing Parametersen_US
dc.typeFaculty Papersen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty Papers, Mathematics and Humanities

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NUSAD008-5.pdfNUSAD008-5506.13 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.