Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://10.1.7.192:80/jspui/handle/123456789/3521
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChawla, Sandeep K.-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-28T09:58:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-28T09:58:53Z-
dc.date.issued2012-06-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.1.7.181:1900/jspui/123456789/3521-
dc.description.abstractConsuming two major greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4), to produce synthesis gas, which is a mixture of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2), carbon dioxide reforming of methane shows significant environmental and economic benefits. Recently the development of CO2 reforming of methane (Dry reforming) has been investigated to produce syngas. Even though steam reforming of methane is widely industrialized to produce syngas (a mixture of H2 and CO), lower ratios are needed for oxo- and Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane offers advantages such as the production of syngas with a lower H2 /CO ratio and it obviates a water vaporization step to produce steam, an energy consumer process, and eliminate CH4 and CO2, two major greenhouse gases. However, the process has not found wide industrial application due to severe catalyst deactivation, basically caused by carbon formation. Therefore, it is of great interest to develop stable catalysts without severe deactivation. This work is mainly focused on the development of base metal like nickel-based catalysts to achieve stable operation for CO2 reforming of CH4. The Nickel (Ni)- catalyst prepared by impregnation method using support g-Al2O3 and different types of promoters (CeO2,ZrO2, K2O and MgO) to improve activity, stability and selectivity in order to reduce coke formation and to achieve long-term operation. Nickel catalysts promoted by the CeO2 shows higher dispersion of the metal particle on the surface of the support than the unpromoted catalysts. It has been found that the ZrO2,CeO2, K2O and MgO promoted 10%Ni/g-Al2O3 catalysts shows good activity, stability and long-term operation as compared to the unpromoted catalysts. It reduces the deactivation rate.The catalysts were characterized by the Xray Diffraction Method and BET Method suggests types and nature of crystalline phases present, degree of crystallinity, amount of amorphous content, orientation of crystallites, BET Surface Area ,Pore Volume , Pore Diameter over different Catalysts.en_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries10MCHC16en_US
dc.subjectChemical 2010en_US
dc.subjectProject Report 2010en_US
dc.subjectChemical Project Reporten_US
dc.subjectProject Reporten_US
dc.subject10MCHen_US
dc.subject10MCHCen_US
dc.subject10MCHC16en_US
dc.subjectCPPDen_US
dc.subjectCPPD 2010en_US
dc.subjectCatalytic Conversionen_US
dc.subjectCarbon Dioxide Reforming of Methaneen_US
dc.subjectSynthesis Gasen_US
dc.subjectFischer– Tropsch synthesisen_US
dc.titleCatalytic Conversion of Methane and CO2 to Synthesis Gasen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
Appears in Collections:Dissertation, CH (CPPD)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10MCHC16.pdf10MCHC161.71 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.