Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://10.1.7.192:80/jspui/handle/123456789/5317
Title: Concurrent Estimation of Amlodipine Besylate, Hydrochlorothiazide and Valsartan by RP-HPLC, HPTLC and UV–Spectrophotometry.
Authors: Kothari, Charmi
Keywords: IPFP0125
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Series/Report no.: IPFP0125;
Abstract: Accurate, sensitive and reproducible reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) and ultraviolet (UV) spectrophopometric methods were developed for the concurrent estimation of amlodipine besylate (AMLO), hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and valsartan (VALS) in bulk and combined tablet dosage forms. For the RP-HPLC method, separation was achieved on a C18 column using potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 3.7) with 0.2% triethylamine as the modifier and acetonitrile in the ratio of 56:44 (v/v) as the mobile phase. Quantification was achieved using a photodiode array detector at 232 nm over a concentration range of 2–25 mg/mL for AMLO, 5–45 mg/mL for HCTZ and 20–150 mg/mL for VALS. For the HPTLC method, the drugs were separated by using ethyl acetate– methanol–toluene–ammonia (7.5:3:2:0.8, v/v/v/v) as the mobile phase. Quantification was achieved using UV detection at 242 nm over a concentration range of 100–600 ng/spot for AMLO, 150– 900 ng/spot for HCTZ and 1,200–3,200 ng/spot for VALS. The UV– spectrophotometric simultaneous equation method was based on the measurement of absorbance at three wavelengths; i.e., at 237.6 nm (lmax of AMLO), 270.2 nm (lmax of HCTZ) and 249.2 nm (lmax of VALS) in methanol. Quantification was achieved over the concentration range of 2–20 mg/mL for AMLO, 5–25 mg/mL HCTZ and 10– 50 mg/mL for VALS. All methods were validated according to International Conference on Harmonization guidelines and successfully applied to marketed pharmaceutical formulations. Additionally, the three methods were compared statistically by an analysis of variance test, which revealed no significant difference between the proposed methods with respect to accuracy and precision
Description: Journal of Chromatographic Science, 52 (1) 27-35
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5317
Appears in Collections:Faculty Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IPFP0125.pdfIPFP0125344.17 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.