Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://10.1.7.192:80/jspui/handle/123456789/7334
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGajjar, Sachin-
dc.contributor.authorSarkar, Mohanchur-
dc.contributor.authorDasgupta, Kankar-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-24T07:36:14Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-24T07:36:14Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issnDOI 10.3233/JCM-150594-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7334-
dc.descriptionJournal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 15, 2015, Page No. 801 - 823en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper introduces Fuzzy-Cross, a decision making and information-sharing architecture for wireless sensor networks (WSN) that enables the protocols to achieve energy efficiency, reliability, and low data latency. FUCR retains a layered structure with each layer matching to a communication function to provide a practical and simple design. The administrative plane provided by FUCR collects residual energy from physical layer, data delivery, and channel assessment records from data link layer, packet dispatch rate from network layer and sensitivity of sensing unit from application layer. The information collected is used as input descriptors for running fuzzy logic. Output of the fuzzy logic assists physical layer protocol to decide node’s transmit power; data link layer protocol to decide retransmission time out, back off time and duty cycle; network layer to determine chance of the node to become a relay node and application layer to determine chance of node to become a reporting node. To investigate the extent to which Fuzzy-Cross meets its goals, it is implemented on top of ZigBee standard. Simulation results demonstrated that Fuzzy-Cross with ZigBee outperforms both (i) ADaptive Access Parameters Tuning (ADAPT) with Zigbee and (ii) standard ZigBee without any modifcations. For a single hop network Fuzzy-Cross is up to 12% more energy efficient compared to ADAPT. Delivery ratio of Fuzzy-Cross is up to 12% more and data latency is up to 19% less compared to ADAPT. Similar trend is seen for multi-hop network and for a wide range of operating conditions.en_US
dc.publisherIOS Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesITFEC020-31;-
dc.subjectWireless Sensor Networksen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy Logicen_US
dc.subjectCross Layeren_US
dc.subjectEnergy Efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectData Latencyen_US
dc.subjectZigBeeen_US
dc.subjectEC Faculty Paperen_US
dc.subjectFaculty Paperen_US
dc.subjectITFEC020en_US
dc.titleFuzzy-Cross: A fuzzy based Architecture for Wireless Sensor Networken_US
dc.typeFaculty Papersen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty Papers, EC

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ITFEC020-31.pdfITFEC020-313.73 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.