Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://10.1.7.192:80/jspui/handle/123456789/9394
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPrajapati, Lalitkumar-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T10:13:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T10:13:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.1.7.192:80/jspui/handle/123456789/9394-
dc.description.abstractCustomers are sometime facing an issue with DRC and/or LVS with Synopsys memory compilers. Design rule check (DRC) verifies whether the designed layout can be manufactured by the fabrication lab with a good yield. Layout versus schematic (LVS) verifies whether the layout of the design is functionally equivalent to the schematic of the design. Synopsys Application Engineers (AE) replicates the customers’ testcase and run DRC and LVS on each instance manually. It is time consuming task for AEs. Instead of manually running DRC and/or LVS for each instance that customers send. There is a need to automate this process to save time and provide quicker response to customers. User need to give the configuration as input. The Frontend and Backend views of the instance is generated using “vmc" command. The “view select” option is modified in the configuration file to make the instance generation faster. The ruledeck path is generated by providing the information such as CCS Process, CCS release and metal stack. By using the queryccs -rel command, the value for CCS process, CCS release and metal stack can be obtained. The Cir and GDS file are required for running LVS and only GDS file for DRC. By using standalone command of DRC/LVS for different tools, one can run DRC/LVS on the given configuration file. The script has been enhanced for multiple configuration files. The script will generate the “Top level report" which contains information about ruledeck path and DRC/LVS errors. User can refer this report instead of finding DRC/LVS errors from each individual DRC/LVS report which corresponding to each configuration file. By automate DRC and LVS run, the time needed to run DRC/LVS has been reduced. In case of CALIBRE/ICV_ DRC_LVS, there is an approximate 50% reduction in the timing if run DRC and LVS both using the script. Whereas, in case of CALIBRE/ICV_ DRC/LVS, there is an approximate 44.4% reduction in the timing if run either DRC or LVS using the script.en_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries18MECV15;-
dc.subjectEC 2018en_US
dc.subjectProject Report 2018en_US
dc.subjectEC Project Reporten_US
dc.subjectEC (VLSI)en_US
dc.subjectVLSIen_US
dc.subjectVLSI 2018en_US
dc.subject18MECen_US
dc.subject18MECVen_US
dc.subject18MECV15en_US
dc.titleAutomate DRC and LVS Runen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
Appears in Collections:Dissertation, EC (VLSI)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
18MECV15.pdf18MECV151.84 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.